• Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Uaviator53

  1. The mode C veil does not apply to part 107 operations per the FAA. I asked them not long ago. PM me for more info.
  2. "But keep in mind, these are toy's, " I've just had about enough of your anti DJI CRAP. Try a little honesty when you answer these questions and tell posters you are hustling your own drone and bad mouthing every other drone. This is not your forum, stop attacking manufacturers in order to advance your hidden agenda. Juggernaught, I've been in the commercial UAS business since 2015; if you want honest, non biased answers feel free to PM me (I don't sell drones ). I am done with this guy....Sorry Alan, it had to be said.
  3. "I can see clearly now, the rain is gone"- Jimmy Cliff
  4. Good data, thanks. Hopefully they'll do a battery versus weight in the future.
  5. Got me through 32 years of policing safely (not counting the dog bite- A German Shepherd! traitor).
  6. Thanks for sharing, Ed. Shows everything is "waiveable" if you have enough $$.
  7. I'm sure it's all good stuff. May be worth the $$ depending on one's experience. Embry-Riddle has been the preeminent aviation university since the 1930s. However, it concerns me that young kids may not understand what the certificate training (not degree programs) will really qualify them for. A $200 online class like UAV Coach will get you the Part 107 RPC w/o a need to spend thousands. A youngster aspiring to a UAV career will need lots of training and logbook hours in the big stuff. Unless a young person goes into the military and logs thousands of hours in the big birds (and gets a
  8. UAVUniversity in Phoenix, AZ. Way overpriced at $3,500. Looks very thorough and includes fixed wing. For $1,000 I may do it, since I live 45 minutes from the school, but $3,500 is ridiculous. They also have degree programs.
  9. The shot was commercial the minute they posted the photo on their website. If the aerial photos/videos are used to promote a business their use is commercial, money doesn't have to change hands. From the FAA website: "Recreational or hobby UAS use is flying for enjoyment and not for work, business purposes, or for compensation or hire." The FAA cannot be everywhere and it is up to responsible operators to report outlaw individuals. Kudos to you.
  10. Learn something every day...
  11. What's next? A washer/dryer combo? A Hellfire missile?
  12. Guess Phoenix and Tucson will be on the next release. But sure glad they got Blythe, Ca, the mecca of aviation......
  13. "Also I've noticed that a lot of job posting for pilots of the big boys (Predator, etc) want at least 300-500 flight hours." I've also seen requirements for an FAA commercial pilot certificate w/ instrument rating, in addition to the RPC. "Here is a you think it would be a good idea for the FAA to make guidelines for the commercial drone industry on how many flight hours (or range of hours) is needed to be experienced?" No. The FAA does not regulate experience or hours. That is left up to the hiring agency, as it should be. Fifty hours may be fine for rea
  14. You are opening a can of worms here, the discussion will be hot and heavy. Well, the words "experienced" and "expert" are subjective, with wide definitions & opinions. As a court qualified "expert" in accident reconstruction in my previous police life, the legal standard was one of training, experience, qualifications, research, teaching experience and others, which the trier of facts (the judge) evaluated and ruled on. Once the judge admitted one as an expert you were permitted to offer opinions in court within your subject matter. But you didn't ask for a lot of evasive ans
  15. I am troubled by this; "right next to a neighbor’s home, where young children were playing in the backyard." He shouldn't be flying that close to any person. And yes, no one has the right to shoot at a drone (a federal felony, try to get a US Attorney to prosecute. The local DA could. In AZ criminal damage of anything over $2k is a class 5 felony). Watching his video I don't see how the pilot can ensure he is not violating 107. 39 with all those trees and structures blocking his ground view.
  16. for those who don't have the link
  17. Orientation concerned me at first, as I used to be a manned A/C pilot. With drones that's not an issue, there's no "front" just keep it pointed away from you. I only buy local, a DJI dealer is less than an hour from me. BTW my first drone was a $50 model, didn't jump into a Phantom 3 until I learned to fly...
  18. Bill, If you are new to UAVs I'd stick to DJI. Don't buy into all the "flyaway scare" stories. After 3 years of flying DJI I am convinced 99% of "flyaways" are user errors. Unfortunately, new users are usually less than eafer to admit they made a mistake (ego) so it is easier to blame the drone. A story: Last year my inspire 1 Pro did a 180 turn away from home, after pushing RTH, and began to fly away from me. Had it been 2 years earlier, I may have panicked and lost it. But I quickly switched from GPS to ATTI and turned the bird around, brought it home. In re-assesing my flight, I
  19. Good discussion of transition areas above.(fuzzy magenta). Ed is right on re: Alert area A-371, continuous operations from ground to 2,000 ft. AGL. i'm guessing lots of Army helicopter traffic with some training. May be a good idea to have a VO watching your back....
  20. There appears to be people moving under the drone, but like I stated above, the feds don't seem to care about any operators blatantly violating the rules...unless someone gets hurt.
  21. Thanks, the most annoying video ever, (not blaming you). 21 minutes to define the word "over." I always thought the concept of not flying over people was clear, but I'm a dumb cop with a masters degree in education . BTW, the FAA is really hot to trot on these drone violations (insert sarcasm here), have you noticed all the videos on the web of flights directly over people? I tried to report a particularly dangerous one, gave them the video link, the commercial operator's website link and their response was they could only investigate if I provided the date/time of the flight and pilot's