• Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

0 Neutral

About crm357

  • Rank
  1. This debate can be settled by having an independent testing agency purchase some DJI drone models and take them apart. Completely apart. And see what’s inside. The DOD DARPA labs for one. Underwriters Laboratories or Consumer Reports testing labs another. And the hacker community; look what they’ve accomplished in accessing WiFi routers! If a DJI drone is sending data to China, how does it do it? Fly a DJI drone and find (questionable) broadcast frequencies coming from either aircraft or controller. OR It’s the DJI GO app transmitting collected data via an Internet connection. But this should be relatively straightforward to discover. If someone finds truly questionable transmissions going on, then DJI may have some explaining to do.
  2. thanks Av8Chuck for the quick response; i figured this is where it might wind up. and this surfaces a cautionary tale: the 400’ ceiling rule is not absolute, which might be lost on new drone pilots. always consult the various FAA sources to be sure, and leave enough time prior to any flight operations to ensure one has proper clearance.
  3. forgive me if this isn’t quite the place to post this, but i could use help in airspace interpretation. i’m getting ambiguous readings and i'm trying to ensure that i make the proper interpretation as to where i can legitimately fly. i’m looking to get FAA authorization to fly just inside the Class D airspace of Phoenix Deer Valley airport (DVT). the sectional for DVT shows a ceiling of <4000 feet AGL [-40], but the FAA UAS map at shows a height limit of 300 feet for the quadrangle i wish to fly in (Northwest corner of the Class D boundary). i used Kittyhawk for request FAA authorization via LAANC and at Step 4 of 4 (within Kittyhawk) i came across bullet 5: “Altitude limits are absolute values . . . shall not be added to any structures”. note Kittyhawk is consistent with the map shown by for the quandrangle in question (300’ limit). [i have an snapshot but this site only prompts for an image at a URL and i don't have a URL: it's a PNG file on the hard drive ] FAA regs clearly state that one can fly up to 400’ above the top of a structure (say, a tower) but both the map and Kitthawk/LAANC submission process suggest this is not so. they’re essentially saying that if i need to inspect a communications tower that would require me to fly above 300’ i cannot do it. yes? no?